Daniel Webster

18 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Daniel Webster
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • Safety Research 334
  • Clinical Psychology 62
  • Health 23
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 26
  • Public Administration 10
Replace Joseph Magruder with:
Joseph Magruder United States
Eunhye Ahn United States
Stephanie Cuccaro-Alamin United States
Amy C. D’Andrade United States
Lisa Merkel‐Holguin United States
Michael L. Lauderdale United States
Laura Gypen Belgium
Erg Farmer
Elaine Walton United States
Jana Knot‐Dickscheit Netherlands
Daniel Webster relative to Joseph Magruder United States Joseph Magruder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Joseph Magruder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Webster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Webster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Webster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Webster. The network helps show where Daniel Webster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Webster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Webster Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Webster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200569
2 202165
3 200348
4 201147
5 201633
6 202025
7 200223
8 201117
9 202117
10 200216
11 201815
12
Does community and family engagement enhance permanency for children in foster care? Findings from an evaluation of the family-to-family initiative.
201113
13
The Ties That Bind
201710
14
An Evaluation of the Anchor-Site Phase of Family to Family
20108
15 20217
16 20083
17 20061
18
Child Abuse and Neglect: Attachment, Development and Intervention. David Howe.
20061
19 20230

About Daniel Webster

Daniel Webster is a scholar working on Safety Research, Clinical Psychology, Public Administration, Pharmacy and Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (18 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers), Nursing care and research (1 paper), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (1 paper), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (1 paper) and Legal and Social Justice Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (334 citations), Clinical Psychology (62 citations), Health (23 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (26 citations) and Public Administration (10 citations). Daniel Webster has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Aron Shlonsky, Barbara Needell, Emily Putnam‐Hornstein, Joseph Magruder, Terry V. Shaw, Maurice Alan Brookhart, John Prindle, Eunhye Ahn, Judith B. Wildfire and Christopher Wildeman. Their work appears in journals such as Children and Youth Services Review, Journal of Social Service Research, Journal of Adolescent Health, Child Abuse & Neglect and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact