Daniel Watson

23 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Daniel Watson
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Medical Terminology 6
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 72
  • Oncology 122
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 61
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 11
Replace Xiyu Duan with:
Xiyu Duan United States
Ogawa Japan
Caixia Dong China
Qianyu Guo China
Nicholas J. Thomas United Kingdom
Stathis Philippou Germany
Bryon R. Gomberg United States
Zhigang Fu China
Daniel Watson relative to Xiyu Duan United States Xiyu Duan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Xiyu Duan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Watson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Watson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Watson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Watson. The network helps show where Daniel Watson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Watson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Watson Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Watson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020144
2 200270
3 202442
4 200836
5 200621
6 201919
7 201618
8 200415
9 201612
10 20219
11 20127
12 20217
13 20117
14 20206
15 20045
16 20104
17 20174
18 20244
19 20193
20 20203

About Daniel Watson

Daniel Watson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cell Biology and Spectroscopy, having authored 26 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (3 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (2 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (2 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (2 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers) and Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (6 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (72 citations), Oncology (122 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (61 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (11 citations). Daniel Watson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Robert Rosler, Peter de Vries, Patrice Lee, Anita Kulukian, Andres Forero‐Torres, Scott Peterson, T. Rees, Andrew Dowson, S. Lipscombe and Jeffrey S. DePue. Their work appears in journals such as Organic Process Research & Development, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Journal of Biomechanics, Neuroscience and Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact