Daniel Wasmuth
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
- Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
Papers in
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 5
- Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 1
-
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 6
- Molecular spectroscopy and chirality 4
- Co-authors
- Dieter Seebàch (9 shared papers)Ernst Hungerbühler (4 shared papers)D. Arigoni (1 shared paper)Hans‐Rudolf Loosli (1 shared paper)Reto Naef (1 shared paper)A. Wehrli (1 shared paper)M. Sutter (1 shared paper)Johannes D. Aebi (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Helvetica Chimica Acta (4 papers)CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry (1 paper)Liebigs Annalen der Chemie (1 paper)Angewandte Chemie (2 papers)Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandNetherlandsJapan
In The Last Decade
Daniel Wasmuth
10 papers receiving 541 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Organic Chemistry 454
- Spectroscopy 117
- Pharmaceutical Science 32
- Inorganic Chemistry 59
- Biochemistry 28
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Wasmuth
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Wasmuth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Wasmuth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Wasmuth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Wasmuth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Wasmuth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Wasmuth. The network helps show where Daniel Wasmuth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Wasmuth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 172 | |
| 2 | 1981 | 100 | |
| 3 | 1981 | 80 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 46 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 40 | |
| 6 | 1981 | 39 | |
| 7 | 1979 | 34 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 26 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1979 | 20 |
About Daniel Wasmuth
Daniel Wasmuth is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology and Biomaterials, having authored 10 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (5 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (4 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (1 paper), Neurological diseases and metabolism (1 paper) and Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (454 citations), Spectroscopy (117 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (32 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (59 citations) and Biochemistry (28 citations). Daniel Wasmuth has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Dieter Seebàch, Ernst Hungerbühler, D. Arigoni, Hans‐Rudolf Loosli, Reto Naef, A. Wehrli, M. Sutter, Johannes D. Aebi, Berthold Schenkel and Gerhard Penn. Their work appears in journals such as Helvetica Chimica Acta, CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry, Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, Angewandte Chemie and Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.