Daniel Wang

55 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers

Daniel Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Pharmacy 62
  • Law 138
  • Human-Computer Interaction 41
  • Sociology and Political Science 188
  • Automotive Engineering 47
Replace Shane O’Sullivan with:
Shane O’Sullivan Brazil
Lorenzo D’Angelo Germany
David Rojas Gualdron Canada
Marcel Braun Germany
Lynne H. Martin United States
Dini Oktarina Dwi Handayani Malaysia
Yu‐Te Huang Hong Kong
Larry S. Miller United States
Pedro Valero‐Mora Spain
Pat A. Brown United States
Daniel Wang relative to Shane O’Sullivan Brazil Shane O’Sullivan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×58×
Shane O’Sullivan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Wang. The network helps show where Daniel Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Wang Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201192
2 200560
3 201757
4 199853
5 201450
6 201444
7
Resenha do livro: Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang; Timm, Luciano Benetti (org.). Direitos Fundamentais: orçamento e e reserva do possível (Porto Alegre, Livraria do Advogado Editora, 2008)
200941
8 202237
9 200628
10 201721
11 201617
12 201216
13 199412
14 201512
15 202010
16
Is Mandatory Vaccination for COVID-19 Constitutional under Brazilian Law?
202110
17 20129
18 20189
19 20089
20 20178

About Daniel Wang

Daniel Wang is a scholar working on Law, Pharmacy, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions, having authored 61 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Health in Brazil (22 papers), Brazilian Legal Issues (14 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers), Human Rights and Development (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (5 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (62 citations), Law (138 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (41 citations), Sociology and Political Science (188 citations) and Automotive Engineering (47 citations). Daniel Wang has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Magdalena Bałazińska, Emad Soroush, Yuru Zhang, Tom F. Dann, Steven Nicholas Rogak, Vanessa Elias de Oliveira, Erminia Colucci, Yuhui Wang, Yuan‐Shin Lee and Wang Yong. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Journal of Medical Ethics, Human Rights Law Review, npj Flexible Electronics and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact