Human Rights Law Review

653 papers and 3.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 653 papers published in Human Rights Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Human Rights Law Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (448 papers), Sociology and Political Science (345 papers) and Law (216 papers) specifically the topics of International Law and Human Rights (224 papers), Human Rights and Development (181 papers) and European and International Law Studies (121 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Rights Law Review are Peter W. French, Rosemary Kayess, Michael O’Flaherty, Andrew Mowbray, Dominic McGoldrick, J.H. Gerards, Rosanna Spanò, Piers Gooding, Alexandra Timmer and Jeremy Fisher.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Rights Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Rights Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Rights Law Review.

Countries where authors publish in Human Rights Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Rights Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Rights Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Rights Law Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025