Daniel Wagner

29 papers receiving 907 citations

Peers

Daniel Wagner
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 170
  • Toxicology 67
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 313
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 204
  • Cancer Research 186
Replace Hideyuki Inoue with:
Hideyuki Inoue Japan
Louis Holdstock United States
Peter K. Thanos United States
Cláudia Schilling Germany
Reid Robison United States
Elena Akimova Austria
Robert W. Gould United States
Terrence Sills Canada
P.S. Jensen Denmark
Daniel Wagner relative to Hideyuki Inoue Japan Hideyuki Inoue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Hideyuki Inoue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Wagner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Wagner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Wagner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Wagner. The network helps show where Daniel Wagner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Wagner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Wagner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Wagner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013119
2 201494
3 199279
4 201077
5 201052
6 201547
7 200945
8 199841
9 201038
10
Distribution of hypocretin-containing neurons in the lateral hypothalamus and C-fos-immunoreactive neurons in the VLPO.
200036
11 199635
12 199933
13 201232
14 201031
15 201429
16 201223
17 201222
18 199422
19 201317
20 199716

About Daniel Wagner

Daniel Wagner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 942 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (9 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (8 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (7 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (6 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (5 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (170 citations), Toxicology (67 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (313 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations) and Cancer Research (186 citations). Daniel Wagner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include Euphrosyne Gouzoulis‐Mayfrank, Jörg Daumann, Benjamin Becker, Charles P. Pollak, Yvan Devaux, Jennifer Zangrando, Mélanie Vausort, Elmar Spuentrup, Peter E. Stokes and Marc Tittgemeyer. Their work appears in journals such as SLEEP, Psychopharmacology, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Leukocyte Biology and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact