Daniel W. Smith

25 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

Daniel W. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Geography, Planning and Development 61
  • History and Philosophy of Science 37
  • General Psychology 8
  • Cultural Studies 51
  • Philosophy 47
Replace Emilie Gomart with:
Emilie Gomart Netherlands
Mike Fortun United States
N. L. Wilson Australia
Gaymon Bennett United States
Luce Giard
Evelleen Richards Australia
Aryn Martin Canada
Colin Davis United Kingdom
Lisa Heldke United States
Cori Hayden United States
Daniel W. Smith relative to Emilie Gomart Netherlands Emilie Gomart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Emilie Gomart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Smith. The network helps show where Daniel W. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel W. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel W. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002360
2 196779
3 201825
4 201725
5 199924
6 201123
7 202115
8
Thumbelina: The Culture and Technology of Millennials
201414
9 19968
10 20127
11 20046
12 20084
13 20164
14 20234
15 19973
16 20083
17 20043
18 20232
19 20002
20 20052

About Daniel W. Smith

Daniel W. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Philosophy and General Health Professions, having authored 27 papers that have together received 621 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (2 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (2 papers), Industrial Gas Emission Control (1 paper), 14-3-3 protein interactions (1 paper) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (61 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations), General Psychology (8 citations), Cultural Studies (51 citations) and Philosophy (47 citations). Daniel W. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Isabelle Stengers, Robert Evans, E.G. McDaniel, G. L. Laqueur, Maria Spatz, B. Christopher Frueh, Deborah A. O′Neil, Derry K. Mercer, Michel Serres and Craig N. Sawchuk. Their work appears in journals such as Water Environment Research, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Experimental Biology and Medicine, Infection and Immunity and Journal of Community Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact