Daniel T. Ohm

23 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Daniel T. Ohm
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Biological Psychiatry 54
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 68
  • Neurology 127
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 114
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 155
Replace Christopher D. Whelan with:
Christopher D. Whelan United States
Gideon F. Meerhoff Netherlands
Carl L. Sikkema United States
Kelly C. Rilett Canada
Erwan Le Maître Sweden
Cristina Bañuelos United States
Daniel Radzicki United States
Zhifeng Zhou United States
Emine Eren‐Koçak Türkiye
Claudia Falfán-Melgoza Germany
Daniel T. Ohm relative to Christopher D. Whelan United States Christopher D. Whelan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Christopher D. Whelan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Ohm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Ohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Ohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Ohm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Ohm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Ohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Ohm. The network helps show where Daniel T. Ohm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. Ohm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel T. Ohm Line = papers co-authored together Daniel T. Ohm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011173
2 201756
3 201451
4 202048
5 201934
6 201932
7 202127
8 201226
9 202124
10 202018
11 202217
12 202216
13 202216
14 202216
15 201911
16 201811
17 201311
18 20247
19 20225
20 20243

About Daniel T. Ohm

Daniel T. Ohm is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Neurology, Neurology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 27 papers that have together received 607 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (17 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (54 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (68 citations), Neurology (127 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (114 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (155 citations). Daniel T. Ohm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include John H. Morrison, William G.M. Janssen, Erik B. Bloss, Bruce S. McEwen, Frank Yuk, Karl M. Saardi, Sandra Weıntraub, Emily Joy Rogalski, Peter R. Rapp and Changiz Geula. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Neuropathologica, Acta Neuropathologica Communications, Neurology, Neuroscience and Brain Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact