Daniel T. Ohm

22 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Daniel T. Ohm
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Biological Psychiatry 60
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 68
  • Neurology 134
  • Physiology 199
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 146
Replace Christopher D. Whelan with:
Christopher D. Whelan United States
Kelly C. Rilett Canada
Gideon F. Meerhoff Netherlands
Adeline Rachalski Canada
Derya Sargin Canada
Brian F. Corbett United States
Claudia Falfán-Melgoza Germany
J. Lynne Greenup United States
Jan‐Oliver Hollnagel Germany
Dana Most United States
Daniel T. Ohm relative to Christopher D. Whelan United States Christopher D. Whelan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Christopher D. Whelan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Ohm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Ohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Ohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Ohm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Ohm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Ohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Ohm. The network helps show where Daniel T. Ohm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. Ohm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel T. Ohm Line = papers co-authored together Daniel T. Ohm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011166
2 201447
3 202041
4 201931
5 201931
6 201224
7 202124
8 202123
9 202018
10 202215
11 202215
12 202213
13 202212
14 201910
15 201810
16 20139
17 20246
18 20225
19 20242
20 20251

About Daniel T. Ohm

Daniel T. Ohm is a scholar working on Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (17 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers) and Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (60 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (68 citations), Neurology (134 citations), Physiology (199 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (146 citations). Daniel T. Ohm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include John H. Morrison, William G.M. Janssen, Erik B. Bloss, Bruce S. McEwen, Frank Yuk, Sandra Weıntraub, Eileen H. Bigio, Changiz Geula, Peter R. Rapp and Tamar Gefen. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Neuropathologica, Acta Neuropathologica Communications, Journal of Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact