Daniel Stricker

24 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Daniel Stricker
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Otorhinolaryngology 27
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Family Practice 9
  • Human-Computer Interaction 31
  • Computer Science Applications 26
Replace Jodie Jenkinson with:
Jodie Jenkinson Canada
Sherrie P. Gott United States
Gonçalo Cruz Portugal
Amanda Meyer Australia
Joanna Black New Zealand
Peter A. Beddow United States
Matteo Orsoni Italy
Juan José Navarro Spain
Christiana Aravi Cyprus
Daniel Stricker relative to Jodie Jenkinson Canada Jodie Jenkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.5×
Jodie Jenkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Stricker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Stricker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Stricker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Stricker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Stricker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Stricker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Stricker. The network helps show where Daniel Stricker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Stricker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Stricker Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Stricker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200876
2 201065
3 201737
4 202032
5 201026
6 201623
7 201922
8 201820
9 201016
10 201113
11 202011
12 20249
13 20107
14 20204
15 20233
16 20243
17 20203
18
When and how to assess subjective overall judgments of presence?
20082
19 20222
20 20222

About Daniel Stricker

Daniel Stricker is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 28 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Conferences and Exhibitions Management (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (27 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations), Family Practice (9 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations) and Computer Science Applications (26 citations). Daniel Stricker has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include David Weibel, Bartholomäus Wissmath, Sissel Guttormsen, Sören Huwendiek, Kai Schnabel, Lukas Anschuetz, Robert Greif, Joana Berger‐Estilita, Fred W. Mast and Marco Caversaccio. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Education, Patient Education and Counseling, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Swiss Medical Weekly and Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact