Daniel S. Weitzner

27 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Daniel S. Weitzner
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Biological Psychiatry 30
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 149
  • Neurology 59
  • Physiology 178
Replace Geetha Ramaswamy with:
Geetha Ramaswamy United States
Jeanette Günther United States
Raymond Levy United Kingdom
Sha Sha China
Arash Mowla Iran
S. Knox United Kingdom
Elisabetta Broggio Italy
Lance Macaulay Australia
W. James Deardorff United States
Maurits Johansson Sweden
Daniel S. Weitzner relative to Geetha Ramaswamy United States Geetha Ramaswamy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×57×
Geetha Ramaswamy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Weitzner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Weitzner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Weitzner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Weitzner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Weitzner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Weitzner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Weitzner. The network helps show where Daniel S. Weitzner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S. Weitzner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S. Weitzner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S. Weitzner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015125
2 201564
3 201546
4 202028
5 201424
6 201816
7 202016
8 202414
9 201513
10 201910
11 20218
12 20208
13 20227
14 20196
15 20224
16 20194
17 20214
18 20184
19 20214
20 20213

About Daniel S. Weitzner

Daniel S. Weitzner is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 27 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (30 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (149 citations), Neurology (59 citations) and Physiology (178 citations). Daniel S. Weitzner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Miranda N. Reed, Holly C. Hunsberger, Carolyn C. Rudy, Matthew Calamia, Alyssa N. De Vito, Linda Kotilinek, Elizabeth B. Engler-Chiurazzi, Karen H. Ashe, John Bernstein and Greg A. Gerhardt. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychology, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact