Daniel S. Feldman

446 citations
17 papers · 380 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel S. Feldman

16 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Daniel S. Feldman
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 125
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 140
  • Developmental Neuroscience 15
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 65
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 65
Replace Renate Jäckel with:
Renate Jäckel Germany
Sumii Yamamoto Japan
Farzana Hoda United Kingdom
Joseph G. Chusid United States
Bengt Nilsson Sweden
Kathryn M. Ryder United States
Youji Takeda Japan
Eric A. Harris United States
R. Lake United States
Antonino Pavone Italy
Daniel S. Feldman relative to Renate Jäckel Germany Renate Jäckel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Renate Jäckel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Feldman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Feldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Feldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Feldman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Feldman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Feldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Feldman. The network helps show where Daniel S. Feldman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S. Feldman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S. Feldman Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S. Feldman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 198684
2 198873
3
The treatment of complete heart block with an implanted, controllable pacemaker.
196256
4 199049
5 197148
6 196617
7 199016
8 19929
9 19526
10 19755
11 19904
12 19894
13 19774
14 19922
15 19761
16 19841
17 19721

About Daniel S. Feldman

Daniel S. Feldman is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (2 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (125 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (140 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (15 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (65 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (65 citations). Daniel S. Feldman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James L. Thompson, Gregory L. Holmes, Richard Cohen, Ádrian Kantrowitz, John E. Schmidt, C. J. Watson, James S. Lieberman, Richard D. Levere, Ruth Cardinal and Kalarickal J. Oommen. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Epilepsy Research, Epilepsia and The American Journal of the Medical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact