Daniel Ré
Impact in
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Genetics top 2%
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Papers in
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 30
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 6
- Genetics 19
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research 17
- Co-authors
- Volker Diehl (27 shared papers)Roman K. Thomas (6 shared papers)Jürgen Wolf (11 shared papers)Ralf Küppers (3 shared papers)Markus Müschen (3 shared papers)Klaus Rajewsky (2 shared papers)Andrea Staratschek‐Jox (7 shared papers)Hans Tesch (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Blood (8 papers)Annals of Oncology (3 papers)British Journal of Haematology (3 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (3 papers)The Lancet Oncology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Ré
63 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 948
- Genetics 324
- Oncology 706
- Immunology 362
- Cancer Research 173
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Ré
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Ré's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Ré with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Ré more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Ré
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Ré. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Ré. The network helps show where Daniel Ré may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Ré, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 178 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 172 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 133 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 113 | |
| 5 | Oct-2 and Bob-1 deficiency in Hodgkin and Reed Sternberg cells. | 2001 | 110 |
| 6 | 2001 | 99 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 91 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 83 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 75 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 75 | |
| 11 | Somatic mutations of the CD95 gene in Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells. | 2000 | 74 |
| 12 | 2005 | 66 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 58 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 47 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 41 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 38 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 26 |
About Daniel Ré
Daniel Ré is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Hematology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (30 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (17 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (7 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (7 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (6 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (5 papers) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (948 citations), Genetics (324 citations), Oncology (706 citations), Immunology (362 citations) and Cancer Research (173 citations). Daniel Ré has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Volker Diehl, Roman K. Thomas, Jürgen Wolf, Ralf Küppers, Markus Müschen, Klaus Rajewsky, Andrea Staratschek‐Jox, Hans Tesch, Martin R. Weihrauch and Heribert Bohlen. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Annals of Oncology, British Journal of Haematology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and The Lancet Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.