Daniel R. Murphy

54 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Daniel R. Murphy
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Family Practice 214
  • Health Information Management 706
  • Emergency Medical Services 150
  • Health Informatics 38
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 36
Replace Donna Espadas with:
Donna Espadas United States
Rajeev Chaudhry United States
Julie Li Australia
Erin P. Balogh United States
Diane Hauser United States
Jonathan S. Einbinder United States
Shivan J. Mehta United States
Saverio M. Maviglia United States
Nilay D. Shah United States
Scott R. Walter Australia
Daniel R. Murphy relative to Donna Espadas United States Donna Espadas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Donna Espadas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Murphy. The network helps show where Daniel R. Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel R. Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel R. Murphy Line = papers co-authored together Daniel R. Murphy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012114
2 2013112
3 2018100
4 201697
5 201585
6 201275
7 201661
8 201050
9 201243
10 201543
11 201442
12 201241
13 201540
14 201239
15 201939
16 201938
17 201736
18 201635
19 201630
20 201329

About Daniel R. Murphy

Daniel R. Murphy is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Family Practice, Emergency Medical Services, Oncology and General Health Professions, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (34 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (9 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (6 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (214 citations), Health Information Management (706 citations), Emergency Medical Services (150 citations), Health Informatics (38 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (36 citations). Daniel R. Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Hardeep Singh, Dean Forrest Sittig, Ashley N. D. Meyer, Eric J. Thomas, Elise M. Russo, Brian Reis, Adol Esquivel, Archana Laxmisan, Samuel Nana Forjuoh and Louis Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Applied Clinical Informatics, Journal of General Internal Medicine, JAMA Network Open and Diagnosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact