Daniel Powers

15 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Daniel Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Gender Studies 108
  • Demography 106
  • Health 67
  • Statistics and Probability 38
  • Sociology and Political Science 167
Replace Anna Sanz‐de‐Galdeano with:
Anna Sanz‐de‐Galdeano Spain
Vida Maralani United States
Lisa Calderwood United Kingdom
Jonas Helgertz Sweden
Stacey H. Chen United States
Fabrice Etilé France
Torbjørn Skarðhamar Norway
Liliya Leopold Germany
Jerry J. Maples United States
Daniel Kasprzyk United States
Daniel Powers relative to Anna Sanz‐de‐Galdeano Spain Anna Sanz‐de‐Galdeano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Anna Sanz‐de‐Galdeano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Powers. The network helps show where Daniel Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Powers Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1992179
2 200979
3 201835
4 201628
5 199227
6 202016
7 202215
8 201914
9 201912
10 200810
11 19929
12 20205
13 20233
14 20201
15 20191
16 20230
17 20220

About Daniel Powers

Daniel Powers is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (108 citations), Demography (106 citations), Health (67 citations), Statistics and Probability (38 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (167 citations). Daniel Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Sara McLanahan, Charles F. Manski, Gary D. Sandefur, Debra Umberson, Hui Liu, Catherine Cubbin, Connor M. Sheehan, Ryan K. Masters, James S. Hodges and Liying Luo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Journal of Adolescent Health, Sociological Inquiry, Journal of Health and Social Behavior and Geoforum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact