James Pope

746 citations
42 papers · 544 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

James Pope

38 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers

James Pope
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 52
  • Computer Networks and Communications 167
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 119
  • Biomedical Engineering 223
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 55
Replace Konstantinos Banitsas with:
Konstantinos Banitsas United Kingdom
Foad Dabiri United States
Gabriele Rescio Italy
Ryan McConville United Kingdom
Luca Pernini Italy
Winston Wu United States
Kamen Ivanov China
Anton Umek Slovenia
Nirvana Popescu Romania
Pierre Barralon France
James Pope relative to Konstantinos Banitsas United Kingdom Konstantinos Banitsas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Konstantinos Banitsas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Pope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Pope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pope. The network helps show where James Pope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Pope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Pope Line = papers co-authored together James Pope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018154
2 201872
3 201861
4 201740
5 201725
6 201721
7 202019
8 202018
9 201715
10 197013
11 201813
12 201911
13 201810
14 202110
15 20187
16 20237
17 20196
18 20205
19 19705
20 20234

About James Pope

James Pope is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 42 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (9 papers), Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks (7 papers), Wireless Body Area Networks (5 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (5 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (4 papers), Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (4 papers), IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (3 papers) and Bluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (52 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (167 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (119 citations), Biomedical Engineering (223 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (55 citations). James Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Piechocki, Ian Craddock, Xenofon Fafoutis, Delaram Jarchi, Saeid Sanei, Atis Elsts, George Oikonomou, Christopher Beach, Alexander J. Casson and Letizia Marchegiani. Their work appears in journals such as Data in Brief, Journal of Materials Science, IET Radar Sonar & Navigation, IEEE Access and Future Generation Computer Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact