Daniel Pelaez

61 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Daniel Pelaez
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Ophthalmology 201
  • Genetics 224
  • Urology 113
  • Developmental Neuroscience 39
  • Neurology 110
Replace Samuel Herberg with:
Samuel Herberg United States
Nick L. Occleston United Kingdom
Ben Mead United Kingdom
Darin J. Messina United States
Volker Nehls Germany
Eul‐Sik Yoon South Korea
Miguel Blanquer Spain
Francesca Novara Italy
Panfeng Wang China
Gary S. L. Peh Singapore
Daniel Pelaez relative to Samuel Herberg United States Samuel Herberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Samuel Herberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pelaez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pelaez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pelaez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pelaez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pelaez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pelaez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pelaez. The network helps show where Daniel Pelaez may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pelaez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pelaez Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pelaez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008111
2 2009108
3 201255
4 201245
5 201740
6 201339
7 201337
8 201134
9 201632
10 201528
11 201828
12 201924
13 202124
14 201222
15 202022
16 201322
17 201721
18 202421
19 201820
20 201619

About Daniel Pelaez

Daniel Pelaez is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Neurology and Genetics, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mesenchymal stem cell research (7 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (7 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (7 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (6 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (6 papers) and Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (201 citations), Genetics (224 citations), Urology (113 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (39 citations) and Neurology (110 citations). Daniel Pelaez has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Herman S. Cheung, Chun-Yuh C. Huang, David T. Tse, Wensi Tao, Franklin García‐Godoy, Galina Dvoriantchikova, Dmitry Ivanov, Chi Pui Pang, Tsz Kin Ng and Kwong Wai Choy. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Stem Cells and Development, Cancers and Translational Vision Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact