Daniel P. McCloskey

31 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Daniel P. McCloskey
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Developmental Neuroscience 499
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 256
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 666
  • Biological Psychiatry 84
  • Neurology 221
Replace Anthony‐Samuel LaMantia with:
Anthony‐Samuel LaMantia United States
Sukhee Cho South Korea
Xiao‐Xin Yan China
Takaichi Fukuda Japan
Thomas H. McNeill United States
Fernando H. Lopes da Silva Netherlands
Limei Zhang Mexico
Keith J. Murphy Ireland
Zafar U. Khan Spain
Daniel P. McCloskey relative to Anthony‐Samuel LaMantia United States Anthony‐Samuel LaMantia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Anthony‐Samuel LaMantia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel P. McCloskey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel P. McCloskey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel P. McCloskey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel P. McCloskey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel P. McCloskey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel P. McCloskey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel P. McCloskey. The network helps show where Daniel P. McCloskey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel P. McCloskey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel P. McCloskey Line = papers co-authored together Daniel P. McCloskey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006314
2 2012207
3 2000184
4 2005106
5 2007103
6 200399
7 200696
8 200687
9 200579
10 200777
11 200175
12 200964
13 201458
14 201157
15 200444
16 201037
17 200736
18 200934
19 200832
20 201628

About Daniel P. McCloskey

Daniel P. McCloskey is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Developmental Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (10 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (499 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (256 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (666 citations), Biological Psychiatry (84 citations) and Neurology (221 citations). Daniel P. McCloskey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Helen E. Scharfman, Brenda J. Anderson, Peter A. Tenhula, Mark McHenry, Cynthia S. Hood, Dennis Roberson, Joseph P. Pierce, Jeffrey H. Goodman, Tana M. Hintz and Susan D. Croll. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, Brain Research, Physiology & Behavior, Brain Structure and Function and Epilepsy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact