Daniel P. King

820 citations
29 papers · 483 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel P. King

21 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

Daniel P. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Literature and Literary Theory 74
  • Political Science and International Relations 132
  • Sociology and Political Science 200
  • Management Science and Operations Research 47
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 17
Replace Ian Bryant with:
Ian Bryant United Kingdom
Andrew F. Herrmann United States
Kevin Harris United Kingdom
Oliver Wright United Kingdom
Diana Kendall Australia
Nancy Taber Canada
Peter Rule South Africa
James Lindgren United States
Clyde W. Hart United States
Robert V. Labaree United States
Daniel P. King relative to Ian Bryant United Kingdom Ian Bryant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Ian Bryant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel P. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel P. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel P. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel P. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel P. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel P. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel P. King. The network helps show where Daniel P. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Daniel P. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel P. King Line = papers co-authored together Daniel P. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968154
2 1972107
3 198263
4 199150
5 199941
6 196711
7 19659
8 19987
9 20006
10 20045
11 19814
12 19924
13 19713
14 19823
15 19952
16 19842
17 19892
18 19691
19 19731
20 19941

About Daniel P. King

Daniel P. King is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations, Health, Strategy and Management and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (1 paper), Policing Practices and Perceptions (1 paper), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper) and Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (74 citations), Political Science and International Relations (132 citations), Sociology and Political Science (200 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (47 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (17 citations). Daniel P. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Arthur Niederhoffer, John C. Ball, Carl D. Chambers, Bernard Crick, Richard de Neufville, Anthony Cronin, Howard Jones, Harry Benjamin, Barry Miles and Thomas J. Kiernan. Their work appears in journals such as World Literature Today, Crime & Delinquency, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles and The Rangeland Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact