Daniel Nelson

41 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers

Daniel Nelson
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Public Administration 232
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 280
  • Economics and Econometrics 158
  • Industrial relations 6
  • Political Science and International Relations 146
Replace E. H. Phelps Brown with:
E. H. Phelps Brown United Kingdom
Charles More
Patrick Fridenson France
Marc Maurice France
J. Ron Stanfield United States
Paul Windolf Germany
Thomas Klikauer Australia
Melvin Warren Reder United States
Richard C. Kearney United States
Olivier Zunz United States
Daniel Nelson relative to E. H. Phelps Brown United Kingdom E. H. Phelps Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
E. H. Phelps Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Nelson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Nelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Nelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Nelson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Nelson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Nelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Nelson. The network helps show where Daniel Nelson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Nelson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Nelson Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Nelson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977144
2 1981126
3 1983111
4 199470
5 197456
6 198237
7 197333
8 198731
9 197628
10 197027
11 198127
12 198121
13 197219
14 198415
15 198814
16 198213
17 198111
18 199111
19 199211
20 199010

About Daniel Nelson

Daniel Nelson is a scholar working on Public Administration, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 51 papers that have together received 901 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (21 papers), Management Theory and Practice (17 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (12 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (3 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers), Labor Law and Work Dynamics (2 papers) and Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (232 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (280 citations), Economics and Econometrics (158 citations), Industrial relations (6 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (146 citations). Daniel Nelson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gregory S. Kealey, Stanley Buder, Alexander Keyssar, Dilmus D. James, James Gilbert, Jürgen Kocka, James A. Gross, Maurine Weiner Greenwald, Reginald Whitaker and Gary S. Cross. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Technology and Culture, Labor History and The Business History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact