Daniel Mandallaz

1.4k citations
45 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Mandallaz

43 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Daniel Mandallaz
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 624
  • Environmental Engineering 514
  • Global and Planetary Change 405
  • Statistics and Probability 135
  • Insect Science 165
Replace T. R. Dell with:
T. R. Dell United States
Edwin J. Green United States
Benee F. Swindel United States
James P. Barrett United States
Magnus Ekström Sweden
Andrew Mellor Australia
H. Todd Mowrer United States
Christian Witte United Kingdom
Qing Xu China
J. B. Mankin United States
Daniel Mandallaz relative to T. R. Dell United States T. R. Dell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
T. R. Dell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Mandallaz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Mandallaz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Mandallaz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Mandallaz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Mandallaz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Mandallaz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Mandallaz. The network helps show where Daniel Mandallaz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Mandallaz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Mandallaz Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Mandallaz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006200
2 2007153
3 1981115
4 199777
5 198340
6 201335
7 199932
8 201432
9 201431
10 201331
11 201230
12 200126
13 200026
14 200625
15 201423
16 200723
17 201820
18 201218
19 201617
20 201315

About Daniel Mandallaz

Daniel Mandallaz is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (27 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (22 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (13 papers), Forest Management and Policy (10 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (624 citations), Environmental Engineering (514 citations), Global and Planetary Change (405 citations), Statistics and Probability (135 citations) and Insect Science (165 citations). Daniel Mandallaz has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Canada and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Mau, Jean-Philippe Schütz, Willi Schmid, Michael Goetz, Adrian Lanz, Andreas Hill, Peter Niemz, Christian Ginzler, Peter Bachmann and Katharina Steinmann. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, European Journal of Forest Research, Biometrics, Environmental and Ecological Statistics and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact