Daniel M. Jackson

470 citations
14 papers · 291 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel M. Jackson

12 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Daniel M. Jackson
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 123
  • Marketing 29
  • Neurology 41
  • Artificial Intelligence 70
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 13
Replace Joost Kircz with:
Joost Kircz Netherlands
Raja Marjieh Israel
Wojciech Kozłowski Poland
James O’Sullivan Ireland
Małgorzata J. Krawczyk Poland
Sigrun Goluch Austria
Tetsuya Shimokawa Japan
Bruce Altshuler United States
Maximiliano Montenegro Chile
Friedrich Stadler Austria
Daniel M. Jackson relative to Joost Kircz Netherlands Joost Kircz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Joost Kircz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Jackson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Jackson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Jackson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Jackson. The network helps show where Daniel M. Jackson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Jackson Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Jackson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201955
2 201054
3 201143
4 201942
5 200330
6 202121
7
Sonic Branding: An Introduction
200317
8 202213
9 19856
10 20136
11 20092
12 20211
13 20091
14 19790

About Daniel M. Jackson

Daniel M. Jackson is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (4 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (3 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper), Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper) and Quantum many-body systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (123 citations), Marketing (29 citations), Neurology (41 citations), Artificial Intelligence (70 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (13 citations). Daniel M. Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mahua Choudhury, Pil‐Hoon Park, Shivendra D. Shukla, Edmund Clarke, Mete Atatüre, Claire Le Gall, Dorian A. Gangloff, Maxime Hugues, Emil V. Denning and Emir Festić. Their work appears in journals such as Alcohol, Nature Physics, The Medical Journal of Australia, Physical Review X and npj Quantum Information.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact