Daniel M. Gropper

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel M. Gropper
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Accounting 334
  • Management Science and Operations Research 316
  • Safety Research 196
  • Economics and Econometrics 551
  • Information Systems and Management 127
Replace Michael Maher with:
Michael Maher United States
Bryan K. Church United States
Lori L. Taylor United States
Florian Ederer United States
Mrinal Ghosh United States
Barry M. Mitnick United States
W. T. Stanbury Canada
Steven M. Glover United States
Olivier Armantier United States
Daniel M. Gropper relative to Michael Maher United States Michael Maher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Michael Maher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Gropper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Gropper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Gropper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Gropper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Gropper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Gropper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Gropper. The network helps show where Daniel M. Gropper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Gropper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Gropper Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Gropper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995265
2 1992170
3 2009139
4 199595
5 199360
6 199253
7 201545
8 199137
9 199134
10 201328
11 200727
12 199321
13 199519
14 199617
15 199116
16
Economic Freedom and Happiness
201116
17 201215
18 199715
19 200815
20 200214

About Daniel M. Gropper

Daniel M. Gropper is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research and Education, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers), Housing Market and Economics (10 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (10 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (5 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (5 papers), Management and Marketing Education (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (334 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (316 citations), Safety Research (196 citations), Economics and Econometrics (551 citations) and Information Systems and Management (127 citations). Daniel M. Gropper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Steven B. Caudill, Jon M. Ford, Valentina Hartarska, T. Randolph Beard, Sareen S. Gropper, John S. Jahera, Jung Chul Park, Phyllis B. Acosta, Jennie E. Raymond and Sharon L. Oswald. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Economic Education, Journal of Banking & Finance, Managerial and Decision Economics, Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition and Journal of money credit and banking.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact