Jon M. Ford

1.2k citations
20 papers · 906 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jon M. Ford

20 papers receiving 833 citations

Peers

Jon M. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Management Science and Operations Research 385
  • Economics and Econometrics 465
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 106
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 83
  • Accounting 75
Replace Lisa L. Wood with:
Lisa L. Wood United States
Joseph D. Reid United States
Paul Anthony Cashin United States
Catherine J. Morrison United States
Mehmet Civelek Czechia
Andrew J Scott United Kingdom
Iván Arribas Spain
Jiří Blažek Czechia
Sebastian Kohl Germany
William Leo Silber South Africa
Jon M. Ford relative to Lisa L. Wood United States Lisa L. Wood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Lisa L. Wood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon M. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon M. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon M. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon M. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon M. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon M. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon M. Ford. The network helps show where Jon M. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Jon M. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon M. Ford Line = papers co-authored together Jon M. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1995281
2 1993187
3 2001124
4 199585
5 200168
6 199530
7 199826
8 200625
9 199320
10 199511
11 199711
12 19979
13 20009
14 19956
15 19996
16 19972
17 19972
18 19972
19
Phase II study of a high-dose regimen of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone in advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of favorable histologic type.
19821
20 20021

About Jon M. Ford

Jon M. Ford is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 906 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (4 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (2 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (2 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (2 papers) and Global trade and economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (385 citations), Economics and Econometrics (465 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (106 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (83 citations) and Accounting (75 citations). Jon M. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Steven B. Caudill, Daniel M. Gropper, David L. Kaserman, Grant D. Lawless, Martin W. Lee, William B. Carter, Moshe Fridman, Craig A. Depken, Franklin G. Mixon and Vincent Caggiano. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Review of Industrial Organization, European Journal of Operational Research, Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review and Economics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact