Daniel M. Bolt

195 papers receiving 8k citations

Peers

Daniel M. Bolt
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1.9k
  • Physiology 2.6k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.3k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 646
  • Applied Psychology 122
Replace Laurie Chassin with:
Laurie Chassin United States
Susan C. Duncan United States
Andrea M. Hussong United States
Christopher W. Kahler United States
Ronald R. Holden Canada
Phillip Karl Wood United States
Alan W. Stacy United States
Linda K. Muthén United States
Lesa Hoffman United States
Scott B. Morris United States
Daniel M. Bolt relative to Laurie Chassin United States Laurie Chassin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Laurie Chassin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Bolt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Bolt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Bolt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Bolt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Bolt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Bolt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Bolt. The network helps show where Daniel M. Bolt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Bolt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Bolt Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Bolt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 201 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007514
2 2006433
3 2004416
4 2010356
5 2006251
6 2004207
7 2010182
8 2006176
9 2010164
10 2005163
11 2002161
12 2016147
13 2019138
14 2009132
15 2006126
16 2003123
17 2009117
18 2008113
19 2008111
20 2011104

About Daniel M. Bolt

Daniel M. Bolt is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Physiology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 201 papers that have together received 8.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (78 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (41 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (10 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (5 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (4 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (1.9k citations), Physiology (2.6k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (646 citations) and Applied Psychology (122 citations). Daniel M. Bolt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Megan E. Piper, Stevens S. Smith, Timothy B. Baker, Michael C. Fiore, Allan S. Cohen, Sigan L. Hartley, James A. Wollack, Bruce E. Wampold, Gael I. Orsmond and Marsha Mailick Seltzer. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Psychological Measurement, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Journal of Educational Measurement, Addiction and Applied Measurement in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact