E. Belle Federman

1.9k citations
14 papers · 1.6k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

E. Belle Federman

14 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

E. Belle Federman
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 415
  • Applied Psychology 117
  • Physiology 393
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 256
  • General Health Professions 230
Replace Danielle Barry with:
Danielle Barry United States
Donald R. Marks United States
John M. Kuldau United States
Gregory D. Gudleski United States
Janet Williams United Kingdom
Peter W. Vik United States
James Robinson United States
César González‐Blanch Spain
Stacy Schantz Wilkins United States
Martin E. Rickert United States
E. Belle Federman relative to Danielle Barry United States Danielle Barry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Danielle Barry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Belle Federman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Belle Federman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Belle Federman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Belle Federman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Belle Federman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Belle Federman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Belle Federman. The network helps show where E. Belle Federman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Belle Federman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Belle Federman Line = papers co-authored together E. Belle Federman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2004409
2 1997322
3 1994310
4 1999196
5 200073
6 200263
7 200761
8 199539
9 198735
10 201132
11 200029
12 198928
13 199426
14 200516

About E. Belle Federman

E. Belle Federman is a scholar working on Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology and Applied Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (1 paper), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (1 paper) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (415 citations), Applied Psychology (117 citations), Physiology (393 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (256 citations) and General Health Professions (230 citations). E. Belle Federman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Godfrey D. Pearlson, Stevens S. Smith, Daniel M. Bolt, Megan E. Piper, Michael C. Fiore, Timothy B. Baker, Patrick E. Barta, Allen Y. Tien, Susan L. Bailey and Susan T. Ennett. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, Biological Psychiatry, Epidemiologic Reviews, American Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact