Daniel Loick

455 citations
19 papers · 89 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Loick

13 papers receiving 80 citations

Peers

Daniel Loick
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Gender Studies 15
  • Philosophy 16
  • Sociology and Political Science 61
  • Political Science and International Relations 32
  • General Psychology 1
Replace Daniel Feierstein with:
Daniel Feierstein Argentina
Emma Goldman United States
Klaus Lichtblau Germany
Gill Plain United Kingdom
Peter Coviello United States
Nicholas Chagnon United States
Ramzi Fawaz United States
Neil Corcoran United Kingdom
Katharine M. Rogers United States
J. Herman Burgers
Daniel Loick relative to Daniel Feierstein Argentina Daniel Feierstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Daniel Feierstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Loick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Loick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Loick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Loick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Loick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Loick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Loick. The network helps show where Daniel Loick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Loick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Loick Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Loick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Nach Marx.Philosophie, Kritik, Praxis
201319
2 201915
3
Debating Critical Theory: Engagements with Axel Honneth
202014
4 201411
5
21 Theses on the Politics of Forms of Life
20176
6 20216
7 20174
8 20123
9 20183
10 20122
11 20232
12 20231
13 20151
14 20191
15 20211
16 20140
17 20170
18 20210
19 20140

About Daniel Loick

Daniel Loick is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Gender Studies and Education, having authored 19 papers that have together received 89 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Theory and Philosophy (7 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (4 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (2 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper), Critical and Liberation Pedagogy (1 paper), Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (15 citations), Philosophy (16 citations), Sociology and Political Science (61 citations), Political Science and International Relations (32 citations) and General Psychology (1 citation). Daniel Loick has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Rahel Jaeggi and Titus Stahl. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy & Social Criticism, Critical Horizons, Constellations, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie and Law and Critique.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact