This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Constellations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Constellations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constellations more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Constellations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Constellations.
About Constellations
The 1.1k papers published in Constellations in the last decades have received a total of 14.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Constellations usually cover Political Science and International Relations (464 papers), Philosophy (170 papers), Sociology and Political Science (533 papers), Law (84 papers) and Communication (36 papers) specifically the topics of Critical Theory and Philosophy (156 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (112 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (80 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (69 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (68 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (54 papers), Political Theory and Influence (52 papers) and Judicial and Constitutional Studies (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Constellations are Hartmut Rosa, Nancy Wickwire Fraser, Ulrich Beck, Andreas Kalyvas, Seyla Benhabib, Nadia Urbinati, David Plotke, Jodi Dean, Rainer Forst and Axel Honneth.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.