This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Constellations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Constellations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constellations more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Constellations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Constellations.
About Constellations
The 1.1k papers published in Constellations in the last decades have received a total of 11.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Constellations usually cover Political Science and International Relations (463 papers), Philosophy (164 papers), Sociology and Political Science (524 papers), Law (83 papers) and Communication (35 papers) specifically the topics of Critical Theory and Philosophy (157 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (113 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (80 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (68 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (66 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (54 papers), Political Theory and Influence (51 papers) and Judicial and Constitutional Studies (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Constellations are Hartmut Rosa, Nancy Fraser, Ulrich Beck, Jodi Dean, Nadia Urbinati, Seyla Benhabib, Andreas Kalyvas, David Plotke, Axel Honneth and Oren Yiftachel.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.