Daniel Lavinsky

2.7k citations
69 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Lavinsky

65 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Daniel Lavinsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Ophthalmology 925
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 492
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 350
  • Neurology 83
  • Developmental Neuroscience 33
Replace Ray F. Gariano with:
Ray F. Gariano United States
Jennifer R. Chao United States
Stuart G. Coupland Canada
Yeni H. Yücel Canada
Donald A. Frambach United States
Alessandro Arrigo Italy
Joel Pearlman United States
Hajime Kawamura Japan
Tapan P. Patel United States
Enzo Maria Vingolo Italy
Daniel Lavinsky relative to Ray F. Gariano United States Ray F. Gariano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ray F. Gariano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lavinsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lavinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lavinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lavinsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lavinsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lavinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lavinsky. The network helps show where Daniel Lavinsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lavinsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Lavinsky Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Lavinsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011172
2 2012105
3 2013104
4 201395
5 201080
6 200378
7 201676
8 201371
9 201669
10 200547
11 200547
12 200745
13 201344
14 200841
15 201440
16 201835
17 201031
18 201130
19 201429
20 200928

About Daniel Lavinsky

Daniel Lavinsky is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (35 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (23 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (17 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (16 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers) and Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (925 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (492 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (350 citations), Neurology (83 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (33 citations). Daniel Lavinsky has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Palanker, Michel Eid Farah, Carlos Alexandre Netto, J.A. Cardillo, Nice Sarmento Arteni, Fábio Lavinsky, Rubens Belfort, Philip Huie, Yossi Mandel and Luiz Alberto S. Melo. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Retina, International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, Clinical ophthalmology and Acta Ophthalmologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact