Daniel Palanker

8.3k citations
211 papers · 6.3k · h-index 45

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Palanker

204 papers receiving 6.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Palanker
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.9k
  • Ophthalmology 1.2k
  • Biophysics 253
  • Electrochemistry 229
  • Bioengineering 183
Replace James N. Turner with:
James N. Turner United States
Arnaud Bertsch Switzerland
Yu‐Chong Tai United States
Mark S. Humayun United States
Min Zhao United States
Donald S. Sakaguchi United States
Rosa Villa Spain
Jihun Park South Korea
Robert J. Greenberg United States
Paul R. Stoddart Australia
Daniel Palanker relative to James N. Turner United States James N. Turner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.2×
James N. Turner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Palanker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Palanker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Palanker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Palanker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Palanker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Palanker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Palanker. The network helps show where Daniel Palanker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Palanker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Palanker Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Palanker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 211 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012373
2 2015292
3 2005279
4 1997237
5 2006197
6 2020163
7 2008140
8 2014124
9 2010121
10 2012117
11 2013116
12 2011116
13 2007115
14 2020112
15 2007106
16 2013101
17 200999
18 202293
19 201391
20 200886

About Daniel Palanker

Daniel Palanker is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Biophysics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 211 papers that have together received 6.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (83 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (48 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (40 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (35 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (21 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (20 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (18 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.9k citations), Ophthalmology (1.2k citations), Biophysics (253 citations), Electrochemistry (229 citations) and Bioengineering (183 citations). Daniel Palanker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Georges A. Goetz, Philip Huie, Alexander Vankov, Phil Huie, Keith Mathieson, Theodore I Kamins, Alexander Sher, Ludwig Galambos, Yossi Mandel and Daniel Lavinsky. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Neural Engineering, Retina, Journal of Biomedical Optics and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact