Daniel Lascarez Smith

652 citations
22 papers · 578 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 8
    • Education Systems and Policy 4
    • Higher Education and Sustainability 1

Daniel Lascarez Smith

19 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers

Daniel Lascarez Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Biochemistry 338
  • Plant Science 81
  • Molecular Biology 122
  • Cancer Research 24
  • Spectroscopy 27
Replace Isabel Barrachina with:
Isabel Barrachina Spain
A. Hisham India
Heinrich F. Moeschler Germany
V Dommes Germany
Henri Jacquemin France
K. Sundar Rao Papua New Guinea
De Quan Yu China
Suzanne Ratsimamanga‐Urverg France
Gerald Wurz Austria
A Atef Ebrahim el-Zayat United States
Daniel Lascarez Smith relative to Isabel Barrachina Spain Isabel Barrachina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Isabel Barrachina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lascarez Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lascarez Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lascarez Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lascarez Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lascarez Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lascarez Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lascarez Smith. The network helps show where Daniel Lascarez Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lascarez Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Lascarez Smith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Lascarez Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989114
2 198774
3 198859
4 199052
5 199043
6 198742
7 199341
8 199037
9 199133
10 199431
11 198919
12 199012
13 19626
14 19794
15 20204
16 20182
17 20242
18 20161
19 20211
20 20211

About Daniel Lascarez Smith

Daniel Lascarez Smith is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Education, Cancer Research, Public Administration and Molecular Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (8 papers), Education Systems and Policy (4 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (3 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (2 papers), Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (2 papers), Higher Education and Sustainability (1 paper), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (338 citations), Plant Science (81 citations), Molecular Biology (122 citations), Cancer Research (24 citations) and Spectroscopy (27 citations). Daniel Lascarez Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ching‐Jer Chang, J. Kent Rupprecht, Jerry L. McLaughlin, Y.‐H. Hui, Jerry L. McLaughlin, Jake E. Anderson, John M. Cassady, A. Alkofahi, Charles G. Edmonds and Matthew J. Rieser. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Annals of Botany, Phytochemistry and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact