Daniel Lafond

50 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Daniel Lafond
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • General Decision Sciences 20
  • Social Psychology 158
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 133
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 86
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 57
Replace Gabriella M. Hancock with:
Gabriella M. Hancock United States
Rolf Braune United States
Jans Aasman Netherlands
Dylan Schmorrow United States
Stephanie M. Doane United States
David A. Kobus United States
Diane L. Damos United States
David Scholz Germany
Jerry M. Crutchfield United States
Immanuel Barshi United States
Daniel Lafond relative to Gabriella M. Hancock United States Gabriella M. Hancock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Gabriella M. Hancock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lafond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lafond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lafond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lafond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lafond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lafond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lafond. The network helps show where Daniel Lafond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lafond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Lafond Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Lafond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202044
2 200730
3 201127
4 202026
5 200823
6 200922
7 201118
8 202017
9 201016
10 201915
11 201914
12 201114
13 200913
14 201811
15 201911
16 201610
17 20079
18 20129
19 20138
20 20207

About Daniel Lafond

Daniel Lafond is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Cognitive Neuroscience and Surgery, having authored 57 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (25 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (8 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (8 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (7 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (7 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (6 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (20 citations), Social Psychology (158 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (133 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (86 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (57 citations). Daniel Lafond has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Sébastien Tremblay, Jean‐François Gagnon, Tiago H. Falk, Abhishek Tiwari, François Vachon, Yves Lacouture, Isabela Albuquerque, Mark Parent, Raymundo Cassani and Guy W. Mineau. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Psychological Review and Applied Ergonomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact