Daniel Lafond

69 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers

Daniel Lafond
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • General Decision Sciences 24
  • Social Psychology 220
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 138
  • Human-Computer Interaction 43
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 86
Replace Kevin A. Gluck with:
Kevin A. Gluck United States
Joseph T. Coyne United States
Ryan W. Wohleber United States
Gabriella M. Hancock United States
Jans Aasman Netherlands
Stephanie M. Doane United States
Rolf J. Braune United States
Ciara M. Sibley United States
Yusuke Yamani United States
Helen M. Hodgetts United Kingdom
Daniel Lafond relative to Kevin A. Gluck United States Kevin A. Gluck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Kevin A. Gluck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lafond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lafond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lafond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lafond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lafond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lafond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lafond. The network helps show where Daniel Lafond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lafond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Lafond Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Lafond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202049
2 200732
3 202032
4 201129
5 200924
6 201023
7 200823
8 201119
9 202018
10 201116
11 201616
12 201016
13 201916
14 201915
15 200915
16 201914
17 200713
18 201812
19 201311
20 201911

About Daniel Lafond

Daniel Lafond is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 79 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (33 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (10 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (9 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (9 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (7 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (7 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (24 citations), Social Psychology (220 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (138 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (43 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (86 citations). Daniel Lafond has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Sébastien Tremblay, François Vachon, Jean‐François Gagnon, Tiago Henrique Falk, Abhishek Tiwari, Yves Lacouture, Isabela Albuquerque, Mark G. Parent, Raymundo Cassani and Alexandre Marois. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Behaviour and Information Technology and Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact