Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

8.5k citations
383 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

357 papers receiving 7.9k citations

Peers

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 1.3k
  • Social Psychology 4.7k
  • General Decision Sciences 203
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 584
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 115
Replace International Journal of Aviation Psychology with:
International Journal of Aviation Psychology United States
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior United States
Practical assessment, research & evaluation United States
Ergonomics in Design The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications United States
Human Resource Development Review United States
Health Psychology Review United Kingdom
International Journal of Medical Education United States
Communication Methods and Measures United States
Risk Management United Kingdom
Leadership and Management in Engineering United States
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making relative to International Journal of Aviation Psychology United States International Journal of Aviation Psychology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
International Journal of Aviation Psychology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making.

About Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

The 383 papers published in Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making usually cover Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (83 papers), General Decision Sciences (23 papers), Social Psychology (255 papers), Family Practice (14 papers) and Medical Laboratory Technology (7 papers) specifically the topics of Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (226 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (83 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (52 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (42 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (40 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (27 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (25 papers) and Cognitive Science and Mapping (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making are Mica Robertson Endsley, Christopher D. Wickens, Raja Parasuraman, Thomas B. Sheridan, DAVID B. KABER, Ewart J. de Visser, Gary A. Klein, Karen M. Feigh, Amy R. Pritchett and David D. Woods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact