Daniel L. Bowling

2.0k citations
40 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel L. Bowling

36 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel L. Bowling
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Developmental Biology 372
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 594
  • Music 80
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 296
  • Signal Processing 189
Replace Adena Schachner with:
Adena Schachner United States
Andrey Anikin Sweden
Bruno Gingras Austria
Erin E. Hannon United States
Samuel A. Mehr United States
Nadine Lavan United Kingdom
Manvir Singh France
John R. Vokey Canada
Bronwyn Tarr United Kingdom
Patrick E. Savage Japan
Daniel L. Bowling relative to Adena Schachner United States Adena Schachner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Adena Schachner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Bowling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Bowling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Bowling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Bowling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. Bowling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Bowling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Bowling. The network helps show where Daniel L. Bowling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel L. Bowling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel L. Bowling Line = papers co-authored together Daniel L. Bowling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012177
2 201799
3 201796
4 201579
5 201270
6 201054
7 201747
8 201747
9 200042
10 201737
11 201636
12 201332
13 201931
14 201828
15 201626
16 201122
17 202321
18 202221
19 201621
20 201320

About Daniel L. Bowling

Daniel L. Bowling is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental Biology and Ecology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (16 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (13 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (8 papers), Marine animal studies overview (8 papers), Music and Audio Processing (7 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (5 papers), Music Therapy and Health (4 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (372 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (594 citations), Music (80 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (296 citations) and Signal Processing (189 citations). Daniel L. Bowling has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dale Purves, W. Tecumseh Fitch, Scott A. Huettel, Ronald Carter, Crystal Reeck, Marisa Hoeschele, Kamraan Z. Gill, Christian T. Herbst, Maxime Garcia and Jacob C. Dunn. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, PLoS ONE, Physics of Life Reviews, Scientific Reports and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact