Physics of Life Reviews

1.5k papers and 21.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Physics of Life Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 21.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Physics of Life Reviews usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (508 papers), Molecular Biology (254 papers) and Social Psychology (232 papers) specifically the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (182 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (140 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (112 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physics of Life Reviews are Christian Blum, Johan Paulsson, Meni Wanunu, Patrik N. Juslin, Leonid Perlovsky, Matjaž Perc, Gregory Hickok, Luiz Pessoa, Stuart R. Hameroff and Roger Penrose.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Physics of Life Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physics of Life Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physics of Life Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Physics of Life Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physics of Life Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physics of Life Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physics of Life Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025