Daniel Kreft

402 citations
19 papers · 272 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
    • Health disparities and outcomes

Papers in

Daniel Kreft

19 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Daniel Kreft
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Ophthalmology 95
  • Health 24
  • Family Practice 5
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 45
  • General Health Professions 44
Replace Priya S. Gupta with:
Priya S. Gupta United States
Asel Ryskulova United States
Ana Patrícia Marques Portugal
Kristen Nwanyanwu United States
Gail Ormsby Australia
Jinxiao Lian Hong Kong
Anne Xuan-Lan Nguyen Canada
Marzieh Katibeh Iran
Koen Willekens Belgium
María Alva United States
Daniel Kreft relative to Priya S. Gupta United States Priya S. Gupta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Priya S. Gupta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Kreft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Kreft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Kreft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Kreft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Kreft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Kreft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Kreft. The network helps show where Daniel Kreft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Kreft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Kreft Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Kreft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201970
2 201834
3 201830
4 201123
5 201617
6 201217
7 201215
8 201212
9 202010
10 20228
11 20218
12
[Live longer, suffer more? Trends in life expectancy and health].
20116
13 20226
14 20214
15
Bevölkerungsprognose für Mecklenburg-Vorpommern auf Kreisebene bis zum Jahr 2030
20103
16 20223
17 20223
18
Länger leben, länger leiden?: Trends in der Lebenserwartung und Gesundheit
20112
19 20251

About Daniel Kreft

Daniel Kreft is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Ophthalmology, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Care Issues (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Health and Medical Studies (3 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (95 citations), Health (24 citations), Family Practice (5 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (45 citations) and General Health Professions (44 citations). Daniel Kreft has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gabriele Doblhammer, Rudolf Guthoff, Myra B. McGuinness, Robert P. Finger, Sabine Kischkel, Eberhard Grambow, Jonas Keiler, Andreas Wree, Gabriele Doblhammer‐Reiter and Peter Donndorf. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BMJ Open Ophthalmology and Health & Place.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact