Daniel Klamer

973 citations
34 papers · 790 · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Klamer

33 papers receiving 757 citations

Peers

Daniel Klamer
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Biological Psychiatry 133
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 435
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 48
  • Social Psychology 150
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 121
Replace Jana Doehner with:
Jana Doehner Switzerland
Christie Brannock United States
Zheng-Yi Luo China
Nicole L. Baganz United States
Efrain Ribeiro United States
Tomáš Petrásek Czechia
Kyla Pennington United Kingdom
Rose Chesworth Australia
Katherine M. Nautiyal United States
T.I.F.H. Cremers Netherlands
Daniel Klamer relative to Jana Doehner Switzerland Jana Doehner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jana Doehner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Klamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Klamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Klamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Klamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Klamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Klamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Klamer. The network helps show where Daniel Klamer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Klamer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Klamer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Klamer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200152
2 200450
3 200449
4 200148
5 200746
6 200744
7 200643
8 201937
9 200432
10 200928
11 200728
12 200827
13 200425
14 201524
15 200524
16 200423
17 201820
18 200920
19 200819
20 200419

About Daniel Klamer

Daniel Klamer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology, Physiology and Neurology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 790 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (16 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (12 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (11 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (8 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (133 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (435 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (48 citations), Social Psychology (150 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (121 citations). Daniel Klamer has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lennart Svensson, Jörgen A. Engel, Erik Pålsson, Caroline Wass, Kim Fejgin, Trevor Archer, John Lowry, Nicholas Waters, Walter E. Kaufmann and Jeffrey Sprouse. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, Behavioural Brain Research, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Neuropsychopharmacology and European Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact