Daniel Klamer

984 citations
34 papers · 816 · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Klamer

33 papers receiving 779 citations

Peers

Daniel Klamer
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Biological Psychiatry 110
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 394
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 43
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 38
  • Social Psychology 119
Replace Nicole L. Baganz with:
Nicole L. Baganz United States
Sean P. Farris United States
Ryota Araki Japan
Christie Brannock United States
Pascal Romieu France
Katherine M. Nautiyal United States
Sara Migliarini Italy
Susann Matthes Germany
Tomáš Petrásek Czechia
Hong‐Jin Shu United States
Daniel Klamer relative to Nicole L. Baganz United States Nicole L. Baganz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nicole L. Baganz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Klamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Klamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Klamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Klamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Klamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Klamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Klamer. The network helps show where Daniel Klamer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Klamer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Klamer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Klamer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200155
2 200451
3 200151
4 200749
5 200449
6 200747
7 200644
8 201938
9 200432
10 200729
11 200928
12 200827
13 200426
14 201525
15 200524
16 200423
17 200921
18 201821
19 201120
20 200820

About Daniel Klamer

Daniel Klamer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Social Psychology and Neurology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 816 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (10 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (6 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (6 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (110 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (394 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (43 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (38 citations) and Social Psychology (119 citations). Daniel Klamer has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Lennart Svensson, Jörgen A. Engel, Erik Pålsson, Caroline Wass, Kim Fejgin, Trevor Archer, John Lowry, Nicholas Waters, Mark A. Geyer and Virginia L. Masten. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, Behavioural Brain Research, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Neuropsychopharmacology and Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact