Daniel K. Pryce

714 citations
37 papers · 495 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel K. Pryce

33 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers

Daniel K. Pryce
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Political Science and International Relations 349
  • Health 96
  • Sociology and Political Science 454
  • Gender Studies 64
  • Clinical Psychology 54
Replace Yung‐Lien Lai with:
Yung‐Lien Lai Taiwan
Mengyan Dai United States
Weston J. Morrow United States
Brian L. Withrow United States
Megan O’Neill United Kingdom
Vaughn J. Crichlow United States
Sandesh Sivakumaran United Kingdom
Michelle D. Bonner Canada
Venessa Garcia United States
Wm. Reed Benedict United States
Daniel K. Pryce relative to Yung‐Lien Lai Taiwan Yung‐Lien Lai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Yung‐Lien Lai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel K. Pryce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel K. Pryce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel K. Pryce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel K. Pryce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel K. Pryce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel K. Pryce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel K. Pryce. The network helps show where Daniel K. Pryce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Daniel K. Pryce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel K. Pryce Line = papers co-authored together Daniel K. Pryce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201675
2 201640
3 201838
4 202138
5 202132
6 201631
7 202025
8 202125
9 201925
10 201822
11 201619
12 202017
13 201917
14 202216
15 202110
16 20209
17 20218
18 20187
19 20186
20 20235

About Daniel K. Pryce

Daniel K. Pryce is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Health, Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 37 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (28 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (24 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (5 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (5 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (3 papers) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (349 citations), Health (96 citations), Sociology and Political Science (454 citations), Gender Studies (64 citations) and Clinical Psychology (54 citations). Daniel K. Pryce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ghana and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Edward R. Maguire, Devon Johnson, Francis D. Boateng, Randy R. Gainey, George Wilson, Robert A. Brown, Ajima Olaghere, Ming‐Li Hsieh and Claire Seungeun Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Crime & Delinquency, Criminal Justice Studies, Social Science Quarterly, Criminal Justice Policy Review and Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact