Daniel J. Whitcomb

3.3k citations
38 papers · 2.6k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Whitcomb

38 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Daniel J. Whitcomb
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Biological Psychiatry 183
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Neurology 341
  • Developmental Neuroscience 154
  • Physiology 950
Replace Tariq Ahmed with:
Tariq Ahmed Belgium
Stéphane Peineau France
Jin‐Shun Qi China
Jian‐Zhi Wang China
Gemma Molinaro Italy
Diego Ruano Spain
Kalpana Merchant United States
Ángel Manuel Carrión Spain
Daniel J. Whitcomb relative to Tariq Ahmed Belgium Tariq Ahmed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tariq Ahmed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Whitcomb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Whitcomb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Whitcomb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Whitcomb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Whitcomb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Whitcomb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Whitcomb. The network helps show where Daniel J. Whitcomb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Whitcomb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Whitcomb Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Whitcomb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010461
2 2011273
3 2013239
4 2015160
5 2012154
6 2009123
7 201592
8 201090
9 201483
10 201381
11 201264
12 201964
13 201661
14 200961
15 201756
16 201655
17 201653
18 201248
19 202144
20 200742

About Daniel J. Whitcomb

Daniel J. Whitcomb is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (23 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (183 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Neurology (341 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (154 citations) and Physiology (950 citations). Daniel J. Whitcomb has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kwangwook Cho, Jihoon Jo, Philip Regan, Morgan Sheng, Shih‐Ching Lo, Thomas M. Piers, Zheng Li, Jie‐Min Jia, Song Jiao and Graham L. Collingridge. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Brain stimulation, Molecular Brain, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology and Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact