Daniel J. Warner

10 papers receiving 549 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Warner
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 336
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 44
  • Pharmacology 38
  • Molecular Biology 121
  • Oncology 29
Replace Hitomi Yuki with:
Hitomi Yuki Japan
Jacquelyn L. Klug-McLeod United States
Tim Knehans Germany
Donatella Callegari Italy
Philip M. Dean United Kingdom
Michael Reutlinger Switzerland
David A. Cosgrove United Kingdom
David S. Millan United Kingdom
Theresa R. Phillips United Kingdom
Dennis P. Anderson United States
Daniel J. Warner relative to Hitomi Yuki Japan Hitomi Yuki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Hitomi Yuki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Warner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Warner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Warner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Warner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Warner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Warner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Warner. The network helps show where Daniel J. Warner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Warner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Warner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Warner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2011233
2 2005158
3 201273
4 201059
5 201430
6 201217
7 201015
8 20074
9 20092
10 20122

About Daniel J. Warner

Daniel J. Warner is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1 paper), Protein Structure and Dynamics (1 paper), thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses (1 paper), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (1 paper), Phosphodiesterase function and regulation (1 paper), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (1 paper) and Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (336 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (44 citations), Pharmacology (38 citations), Molecular Biology (121 citations) and Oncology (29 citations). Daniel J. Warner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Ed Griffen, Andrew G. Leach, Graeme R. Robb, Charles A. Laughton, Steve W. Homans, Simon E. V. Phillips, Richard J. Bingham, Stephen A. St-Gallay, Tobias Noeske and Simone H. Stahl. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, MedChemComm, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact