John McLevey

24 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

John McLevey
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • General Social Sciences 15
  • Sociology and Political Science 193
  • Information Systems and Management 27
  • Communication 26
  • History and Philosophy of Science 18
Replace Bas Hofstra with:
Bas Hofstra Netherlands
Federico Bianchi Italy
Meiko Makita United Kingdom
Erin Hartman United States
James G. Ennis United States
Raphael Silberzahn United Kingdom
Juan Muñoz-Justícia Spain
Diego Kozlowski Canada
Weihua An United States
Jason Pilny Radford United States
John McLevey relative to Bas Hofstra Netherlands Bas Hofstra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bas Hofstra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John McLevey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John McLevey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John McLevey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John McLevey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John McLevey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John McLevey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John McLevey. The network helps show where John McLevey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside John McLevey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John McLevey Line = papers co-authored together John McLevey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201898
2 201639
3 201835
4 202034
5 202429
6 201426
7 202214
8 201514
9 201911
10 201610
11 202210
12 20219
13 20226
14 20206
15 20216
16 20215
17 20223
18 20213
19 20232
20
Industrial Development and Eco-Tourisms: Can Oil Extraction and Nature Conservation Co-Exist?
20202

About John McLevey

John McLevey is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, General Social Sciences, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 25 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (4 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (3 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers) and Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Social Sciences (15 citations), Sociology and Political Science (193 citations), Information Systems and Management (27 citations), Communication (26 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations). John McLevey has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Owen Gallupe, Mark C. J. Stoddart, Alice Mattoni, Peter J. Carrington, James G. Scott, David B. Tindall, Jessica Rizk, Catherine Mei Ling Wong, Robert Evans and Janice Aurini. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, Synthese, Social Networks, American Psychologist and Journal of Quantitative Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact