Daniel J. Scott

80 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Daniel J. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Reproductive Medicine 355
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 789
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 344
  • Molecular Biology 804
  • Occupational Therapy 38
Replace Sarah Jones with:
Sarah Jones United Kingdom
Martina Kočan Australia
Frank A. Lattanzio United States
Ran Huo China
D. M. Robertson United Kingdom
Hiroyuki Oshima Japan
Xue Ma China
Mayumi Watanabe Japan
Johann Leban United States
Shigenobu Toné Japan
Daniel J. Scott relative to Sarah Jones United Kingdom Sarah Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Sarah Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Scott. The network helps show where Daniel J. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996441
2 2014174
3 2006130
4 201377
5 201871
6 201262
7 200660
8 200746
9 200543
10 202440
11 201640
12 201240
13 201838
14 201434
15 200833
16 200429
17 201827
18 201827
19 200526
20 202025

About Daniel J. Scott

Daniel J. Scott is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 84 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy-related medical research (28 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (24 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (17 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (11 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (5 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers) and Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (355 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (789 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (344 citations), Molecular Biology (804 citations) and Occupational Therapy (38 citations). Daniel J. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ross A. D. Bathgate, Andrea Dunaif, Randall W. Whitcomb, Diane T. Finegood, Andreas Plückthun, Geoffrey W. Tregear, Sharon Layfield, Paul R. Gooley, Pascal Egloff and Lutz Kummer. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nature Communications, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes and Journal of Molecular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact