Daniel J. Gardner

490 citations
17 papers · 274 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Gardner

17 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Rehabilitation 64
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 58
  • Biomaterials 43
  • Atmospheric Science 54
  • Occupational Therapy 10
Replace E. Kraus with:
E. Kraus United States
David Kriegel United States
Yulan Cai China
Takuya Kawabata Japan
Yaqing Liu China
M.-A. Billon-Galland France
Deborah J. Steele Canada
Bosong Zhang United States
Steven R. Sparks United States
B. M. Wheatley United States
Daniel J. Gardner relative to E. Kraus United States E. Kraus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
E. Kraus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Gardner. The network helps show where Daniel J. Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Gardner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Gardner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201649
2 201845
3 201742
4 199729
5 199818
6 202015
7 201913
8 201813
9 199612
10 20189
11 19958
12 20197
13 20226
14 20223
15 20182
16 19962
17 20221

About Daniel J. Gardner

Daniel J. Gardner is a scholar working on Surgery, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Rehabilitation, Atmospheric Science and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 17 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Planetary Science and Exploration (5 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers), Space Satellite Systems and Control (2 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (2 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (2 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (64 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (58 citations), Biomaterials (43 citations), Atmospheric Science (54 citations) and Occupational Therapy (10 citations). Daniel J. Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include J. A. M. McDonnell, Alex K. Wong, Maxwell B Johnson, Kerri A. Pratt, Andrew P. Ault, Nathaniel W. May, Steven B. Bertman, Matthew J. Gunsch, T. M. VanReken and Philip K. Hopke. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Space Research, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Lymphatic Research and Biology, Atmospheric Environment and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact