Lymphatic Research and Biology

811 papers and 13.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 811 papers published in Lymphatic Research and Biology in the last decades have received a total of 13.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Lymphatic Research and Biology usually cover Oncology (689 papers), Surgery (402 papers) and Physiology (190 papers) specifically the topics of Lymphatic System and Diseases (650 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (168 papers) and Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Lymphatic Research and Biology are David C. Zawieja, Stanley G. Rockson, Leigh C. Ward, Waldemar L. Olszewski, Stephen Barnes, Sheila H. Ridner, Harvey N. Mayrovitz, Jane M. Armer, Bob R. Stewart and Sharon L. Kilbreath.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Lymphatic Research and Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Lymphatic Research and Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Lymphatic Research and Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Lymphatic Research and Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Lymphatic Research and Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Lymphatic Research and Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lymphatic Research and Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025