Daniel J. Berry
Impact in
- Surgery top 0.01%
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
- Hip and Femur Fractures
- Hip disorders and treatments
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Internal Medicine top 1%
Papers in
- Surgery 371
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 232
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 195
- Orthopedic Infections and Treatments 139
- Hip disorders and treatments 44
- Hip and Femur Fractures 29
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 19
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 11
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 7
- Co-authors
- Kevin John Bozic (28 shared papers)Kevin L. Ong (23 shared papers)Steven Michael Kurtz (17 shared papers)Edmund Lau (21 shared papers)Matthew P. Abdel (156 shared papers)David G. Lewallen (107 shared papers)Robert T. Trousdale (72 shared papers)William Scott Harmsen (26 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Arthroplasty (193 papers)Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (89 papers)Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (49 papers)The Bone & Joint Journal (28 papers)Orthopedics (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Daniel J. Berry
426 papers receiving 26.4k citations
Daniel J. Berry's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
- Surgery 22.8k
- Internal Medicine 313
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 166
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 648
- Health Informatics 110
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Berry
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Berry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Berry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Berry. The network helps show where Daniel J. Berry may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Berry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 446 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 1363 |
| 2 | Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 1352 |
| 3 | The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 1052 |
| 4 | Effect of Postoperative Mechanical Axis Alignment on the Fifteen-Year Survival of Modern, Cemented Total Knee Replacements Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 675 |
| 5 | Prosthetic Joint Infection Risk after TKA in the Medicare Population Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 616 |
| 6 | Twenty-five-Year Survivorship of Two Thousand Consecutive Primary Charnley Total Hip Replacements Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 578 |
| 7 | EPIDEMIOLOGY Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 494 |
| 8 | Prosthetic Joint Infection Risk After Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Medicare Population Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 463 |
| 9 | 2005 | 426 | |
| 10 | Patient-Related Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Postoperative Mortality Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 414 |
| 11 | 2005 | 388 | |
| 12 | Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 380 |
| 13 | Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 364 |
| 14 | Patient-related Risk Factors for Postoperative Mortality and Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Medicare Patients Undergoing TKA Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 348 |
| 15 | 2016 | 328 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 324 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 297 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 288 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 281 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 267 |
About Daniel J. Berry
Daniel J. Berry is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Statistics and Probability, Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, having authored 446 papers that have together received 27.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (232 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (195 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (139 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (44 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (29 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (19 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (11 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (22.8k citations), Internal Medicine (313 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (166 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (648 citations) and Health Informatics (110 citations). Daniel J. Berry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kevin John Bozic, Kevin L. Ong, Steven Michael Kurtz, Edmund Lau, Matthew P. Abdel, David G. Lewallen, Robert T. Trousdale, William Scott Harmsen, Thomas Parker Vail and Miguel E. Cabanela. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Arthroplasty, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, The Bone & Joint Journal and Orthopedics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.