Anna Sallis

1.3k citations
28 papers · 859 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Sallis

27 papers receiving 842 citations

Peers

Anna Sallis
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 292
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 36
  • Applied Psychology 51
  • General Decision Sciences 18
  • General Health Professions 197
Replace Sanjoti Parekh with:
Sanjoti Parekh Australia
Kelli McCormack Brown United States
Robin Ireland United Kingdom
Lucy Reynolds United Kingdom
Charlotte de Crespigny Australia
Marta Röing Sweden
Guanyang Zou China
Jane E. Krause United Kingdom
Linda Gibson United Kingdom
Megan Nguyen Canada
Anna Sallis relative to Sanjoti Parekh Australia Sanjoti Parekh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Sanjoti Parekh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Sallis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Sallis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Sallis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Sallis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Sallis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Sallis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Sallis. The network helps show where Anna Sallis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Sallis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Sallis Line = papers co-authored together Anna Sallis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016301
2 202068
3 201563
4 201848
5 201937
6 202034
7 201632
8 201530
9 201327
10 202223
11 201823
12 201922
13 202118
14 202015
15 201915
16 202013
17 201013
18 202113
19 201913
20 202112

About Anna Sallis

Anna Sallis is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 859 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (12 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (2 papers) and Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (292 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (36 citations), Applied Psychology (51 citations), General Decision Sciences (18 citations) and General Health Professions (197 citations). Anna Sallis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Tim Chadborn, Michael Sanders, Michael Hallsworth, Daniel J. Berry, Felix Greaves, Sally C. Davies, Ivo Vlaev, Susan Hopkins, Diane Ashiru‐Oredope and Christopher Butler. Their work appears in journals such as Antibiotics, Trials, BMJ Open, PLoS ONE and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact