Daniel J. Benjamin

3.8k citations
8 papers · 383 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Benjamin

8 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Benjamin
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • General Decision Sciences 46
  • Social Psychology 188
  • Health 67
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • Economics and Econometrics 118
Replace Ambrose Leung with:
Ambrose Leung Canada
Nicoleta Read United Kingdom
Philip A. Michelbach United States
Sebastian Prediger Germany
Marina Bastounis France
Miriam Tatzel United States
Susanne Leder Italy
Thomas D. Gilovich United States
Roselle Wissler United States
Nils Wernerfelt United States
Daniel J. Benjamin relative to Ambrose Leung Canada Ambrose Leung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Ambrose Leung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Benjamin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Benjamin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Benjamin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Benjamin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Benjamin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Benjamin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Benjamin. The network helps show where Daniel J. Benjamin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Benjamin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Benjamin Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Benjamin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2014197
2 2014106
3 200144
4 201213
5 201512
6 20196
7
Beyond Happiness and Satisfaction: Toward Well-Being Indices Based on Stated Preference [post-print]
20144
8
Knowledge management at Siemens Spain
20081

About Daniel J. Benjamin

Daniel J. Benjamin is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and General Decision Sciences, having authored 8 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (1 paper) and Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (46 citations), Social Psychology (188 citations), Health (67 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (118 citations). Daniel J. Benjamin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Ori Heffetz, Miles Kimball, Alex Rees-Jones, Toni S. Shippenberg, Ming He, Etienne Sibille and Miklós Tóth. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Brain Research, Japanese Economic Review, Docs.school Publications and AEA Papers and Proceedings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact