Japanese Economic Review

774 papers and 6.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 774 papers published in Japanese Economic Review in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Japanese Economic Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (593 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (212 papers) and Finance (110 papers) specifically the topics of Economic theories and models (182 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (139 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Japanese Economic Review are Hideshi Itoh, Masahisa Fujita, Alfred Greiner, Nobuhiro Kiyotaki, Kazuo Ueda, Takeo Hoshi, Yoshiyasu Ono, Koji Shimomura, Toshihiro Matsumura and Murray C. Kemp.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Japanese Economic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Japanese Economic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Japanese Economic Review.

Countries where authors publish in Japanese Economic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Japanese Economic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Japanese Economic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Japanese Economic Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025