Daniel I. Sack

1.1k citations
24 papers · 901 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel I. Sack

22 papers receiving 859 citations

Peers

Daniel I. Sack
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Internal Medicine 76
  • Emergency Medicine 140
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 43
  • Surgery 316
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 38
Replace Tad L. Gerlinger with:
Tad L. Gerlinger United States
Glen Bandıera Canada
Anne G. Rizzo United States
Patricia L. Lewis United States
James G. Cushman United States
Carlo L. Rosen United States
Michael F. Oswanski United States
Patrick Mahar Australia
Barry Simon United States
Paul Biever Germany
Daniel I. Sack relative to Tad L. Gerlinger United States Tad L. Gerlinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Tad L. Gerlinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel I. Sack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel I. Sack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel I. Sack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel I. Sack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel I. Sack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel I. Sack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel I. Sack. The network helps show where Daniel I. Sack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel I. Sack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel I. Sack Line = papers co-authored together Daniel I. Sack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007125
2 2006109
3 2005100
4 200678
5 201169
6 200959
7 200744
8 200744
9
Health status of pesticide applicators: postural stability assessments.
199344
10 200635
11 201132
12 200931
13 200929
14 201828
15 201819
16 201412
17 200811
18 20109
19 20098
20 20167

About Daniel I. Sack

Daniel I. Sack is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medicine, Neurology, Surgery and Occupational Therapy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 901 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (5 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (2 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (76 citations), Emergency Medicine (140 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (43 citations), Surgery (316 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (38 citations). Daniel I. Sack has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Sise, C. Beth Sise, Jared L. Antevil, Carlos Brown, Sophia M. Swanson, Gabrielle M. Paci, Steven R. Shackford, Andrew Hopper, Kimberly A. Peck and Michael R. Galarneau. Their work appears in journals such as Quality of Life Research, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, Journal of Trauma Nursing, Military Psychology and Anesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact