Daniel Hosken

27 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers

Daniel Hosken
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Marketing 451
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 40
  • Economics and Econometrics 621
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 97
  • Strategy and Management 165
Replace Panle Jia with:
Panle Jia United States
Michael D. Noel United States
Arthur Fishman Israel
Richard Friberg Sweden
Jean‐François Houde United States
Andreas Irmen Luxembourg
J. Douglas Zona United States
Yoram C. Peles Israel
Lynne Pepall United States
Abraham Hollander Canada
Daniel Hosken relative to Panle Jia United States Panle Jia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Panle Jia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hosken

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hosken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hosken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hosken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hosken

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hosken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hosken. The network helps show where Daniel Hosken may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hosken, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hosken Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hosken links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200885
2 200483
3 201068
4 201567
5 201365
6 200741
7 201440
8 201333
9 201732
10 200131
11 200431
12 201123
13 201520
14 200616
15 200115
16
Using Mergers to Test a Model of Oligopoly
200812
17 200712
18
How do Retailers Adjust Prices?: Evidence from Store-Level Data
200012
19 201111
20 20108

About Daniel Hosken

Daniel Hosken is a scholar working on Marketing, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Pharmacology and Accounting, having authored 28 papers that have together received 730 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Merger and Competition Analysis (22 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (21 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (8 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (8 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (451 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (40 citations), Economics and Econometrics (621 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (97 citations) and Strategy and Management (165 citations). Daniel Hosken has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Orley Ashenfelter, Matthew Weinberg, David Reiffen, Christopher Taylor, Robert Stanton McMillan, John David Simpson, Brett W. Wendling, Suzanne Gleason, David Ashmore and Jonathan B. Baker. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Law and Economics, International Journal of the Economics of Business, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Journal of Industrial Economics and The RAND Journal of Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact