Daniel Guillaume

110 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Daniel Guillaume
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Equine 310
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 671
  • Reproductive Medicine 260
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 194
  • Neurology 300
Replace Albina Jablonka‐Shariff with:
Albina Jablonka‐Shariff United States
Junzo Yamada Japan
Shuichi Kobayashi Japan
Masugi Nishihara Japan
Artur Mayerhofer Germany
Damasia Becú‐Villalobos Argentina
Helen A. Padykula United States
H.‐Dieter Dellmann United States
Zhenmin Lei United States
G. L. Rossi Switzerland
Daniel Guillaume relative to Albina Jablonka‐Shariff United States Albina Jablonka‐Shariff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Albina Jablonka‐Shariff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Guillaume

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Guillaume's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Guillaume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Guillaume more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Guillaume

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Guillaume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Guillaume. The network helps show where Daniel Guillaume may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Guillaume, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Guillaume Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Guillaume links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010261
2 2008125
3 1999104
4 2013102
5 200090
6 201285
7 199269
8 200563
9 201559
10 201048
11 201048
12 201047
13 201546
14 201445
15 199644
16 201444
17 200542
18 201342
19 201339
20 201438

About Daniel Guillaume

Daniel Guillaume is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Equine, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 117 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (41 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (22 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (11 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (10 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (10 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (7 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (310 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (671 citations), Reproductive Medicine (260 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (194 citations) and Neurology (300 citations). Daniel Guillaume has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Philippe Chemineau, Edward A. Neuwelt, Thierry Grisar, Seymur Gahramanov, Nancy D. Doolittle, Johnny B. Delashaw, B. Malpaux, P. Nagy, Peter Daels and Nathan R. Selden. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics, Theriogenology, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, Animal Reproduction Science and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact